| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nordehylop

Joined: 27 Feb 2008 Posts: 21 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: Császár and Szilassi Polyhedra |
|
|
How would one get the Császár and Szilassi Polyhedra in stella? They are two polyhedra that I would like to build for my dad for Father's day. The Császár polyhedron is the only other polyhedron (besides the tetrahedron) without diagonals, and the Szilassi Polyhedron is the only other polyhedron (besides the tetrahedron) where every face touches every other face.
I have a model of the Szilassi Polyhedron already, from nets printed out from here:http://www.ac-noumea.nc/maths/amc/polyhedr/Csaszar_.htm (another question: how to put links in my posts!). But I would like to see the Császár polyhedron more clearly before I build a model of it, and also I would like to be able to size them the way I want them. Plus, they've got to have some pretty neat stellations...
Thanks! _________________ It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dysphras
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:55 am Post subject: Császár and Szilassi Polyhedra |
|
|
Here is the OFF contents for Szilassi and Csaszar polyhedra:
Szilassi:
14 7 21
12.0 0.0 12.0
-12.0 0.0 12.0
0.0 12.6 -12.0
0.0 -12.6 -12.0
2.0 -5.0 -8.0
-2.0 5.0 -8.0
3.75 3.75 -3.0
-3.75 -3.75 -3.0
4.5 -2.5 2.0
-4.5 2.5 2.0
7.0 0.0 2.0
-7.0 0.0 2.0
7.0 2.5 2.0
-7.0 -2.5 2.0
6 0 1 13 8 7 4
6 0 4 3 2 10 12
6 0 12 9 6 5 1
6 11 3 4 7 6 9
6 11 9 12 10 8 13
6 11 13 1 5 2 3
6 2 5 6 7 8 10
Csaszar 1:
7 14 21
3.0 -3.0 -7.5
-3.0 3.0 -7.5
3.0 3.0 -6.5
-3.0 -3.0 -6.5
1.0 2.0 -4.5
-1.0 -2.0 -4.5
0.0 0.0 7.5
3 0 1 2
3 0 2 5
3 0 5 4
3 0 4 6
3 0 6 3
3 0 3 1
3 1 3 4
3 1 4 5
3 1 5 6
3 1 6 2
3 2 6 4
3 2 4 3
3 2 3 5
3 5 3 6
Csaszar 4:
7 14 21
12.0 0.0 -8.485281374238570292810
-12.0 0.0 -8.485281374238570292810
0.0 12.0 8.485281374238570292810
0.0 -12.0 8.485281374238570292810
-4.0 -3.0 0.707106781186547524400
4.0 3.0 0.707106781186547524400
0.0 0.0 3.771236166328253463471
3 0 1 2
3 0 2 5
3 0 5 4
3 0 4 6
3 0 6 3
3 0 3 1
3 1 3 4
3 1 4 5
3 1 5 6
3 1 6 2
3 2 6 4
3 2 4 3
3 2 3 5
3 5 3 6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robertw Site Admin

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 367 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, you'll find that both have already been provided with Great Stella and Stella4D! Look in Stella Library -> More Stewart Toroids. They're not really Stewart toroids, but they are toroids and do appear in his book. You'll find both Csaszar and Szilassi in there.
Rob. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex Doskey

Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 16 Location: Marrero, Louisiana, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: Stewart Toroids |
|
|
I have a website with Stewart Toroids and other figures from his book, including Császár and Szilassi. They are at the bottom of the page for Chapter 20.
http://toroid.doskey.com/
The hard part was modeling them before you could import OFF files. It took quite some effort.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guy

Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 68 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ISTR that these two are duals of each other. So you need only load one and view its dual to get both. _________________ Cheers,
Guy. Guy's polyhedra pages |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ulrich

Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 77 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:55 am Post subject: Re: Stewart Toroids |
|
|
| Alex Doskey wrote: |
The hard part was modeling them before you could import OFF files. It took quite some effort.  |
Alex,
do you still remember how you did it and could you explain it?
Ulrich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nordehylop

Joined: 27 Feb 2008 Posts: 21 Location: Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | ISTR that these two are duals of each other. So you need only load one and view its dual to get both. |
Actually, not so. I really have no idea why, but the duals of these polyhedra on Great Stella look nothing like eachother. Perhaps the polyhedra are distorted in relation to eachother, making it look like they are unrelated polyhedra. _________________ It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robertw Site Admin

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 367 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that's right, they are not geometric duals of each other, just topological duals. If you take the geometric dual you lose the property of non-intersecting faces.
Rob. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex Doskey

Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 16 Location: Marrero, Louisiana, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:52 pm Post subject: The Old-Fashioned Method |
|
|
Ulrich,
It really wasn't a complicated method. I found both models had integer coordinates (I had to multiply the coordinates I had from B.M. Stewart's book by 20 to make them integers). After that, I just made a 3D skeleton using cubes, and faceted out the models using the "top-right" corner of each cube at the desired location. It would have been easier to ask Rob to make it for me, or to hack my own .stel file by hand (back then the file formats were even easier to work with). But I wanted to see if I could do it within the given interface.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|